![]() ![]() ![]() It would reduce to the over lap between different applications and ensure a consistent presentation each step along the way. For example, why not have one common engine sitting at the core of a whole line of products? a set of core libraries on which products can be built – taking the parts of each library that are relevant to the given application and implement them. Personally, I think that the open source world could do a lot better job than Adobe if it got its act together. People want a completely integrated solution from the top downwards. This is why Quark has continued to loose its position in the market the failure to realise that no one *cares* about purchasing one application from one vendor, and then pray that all 5 different titles from five different vendors will hopefully work together. What there needs to be is an eccentric billionaire who can dedicate $2billion to re-creating the whole Adobe chain of products using Qt. It would be like getting sold a car and when it arrives – all you have are 4 wheels. Simply porting one piece of software will not help in the slightest. From photo editing to website and content creation – and everything in between it is a formidable package. And all of them 64bit.īut you’re ignoring the main advantage which Adobe has over other products on the market – Adobe has the whole work flow of products under the one roof. Eventually Adobe could have one codebase for Win/Mac _and_ Linux. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |